Health Economics
CONG Hongbin, ZHAI Kai, LI Shunping, GENG Ling, LI Chaofan
Objective To measure the economic burden of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) from the patient's perspective and assess affordability. Methods Economic burden in this study includes direct medical burden, direct non-medical burden and indirect burden. Medical cost data were collected from five medical institutions nationwide offering ART services to calculate the direct medical economic burden.A patient questionnaire was delivered to gather direct non-medical economic burden and indirect economic burden. the respondents were characterised using frequencies and percentages, while economic burden was described using median and quartile. The Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to compare differences in economic burden. Affordability was evaluated based on the proportion of direct medical economic burden to per capita disposable income. Results A total of 524 patients were surveyed. The proportion of patients undergoing artificial insemination by husband (AIH) was 7.06%, artificial insemination by donor (AID) was 9.54%, in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was 57.25%, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was 26.15%. The median of direct medical economic burden per cycle for AIH, AID, IVF-ET, and ICSI was 7,842 CNY, 12,048 CNY, 35,985 CNY, and 39,685 CNY, respectively. The median of direct non-medical economic burden per cycle was 7,900 CNY, 7,550 CNY, 20,765 CNY, and 24,800 CNY, respectively. The median of indirect economic burden per cycle was 1,075 CNY, 1,880 CNY,2,794 CNY, and 2,149 CNY, respectively. The economic burden of IVF-ET and ICSI was significantly higher than that of AIH and AID, but no statistically significant differences(P>0.05) was identified in economic burden between AIH and AID, or between IVF-ET and ICSI. The proportion of direct medical costs per cycle to the annual per capita disposable income was 20%, 31%, 92%, and 101%, respectively. The median of direct medical costs per cycle was accounted for 9%, 13%, 40% and 44% of the per capita GDP, respectively. Conclusions The economic burden of IVF-ET and ICSI is substantial. Listing these treatments in medical insurance could reduce the direct medical economic burden. Other measures, such as forming specialized alliances across regions, promoting hierarchical medical treatment, providing fertility subsidies, and precisely identifying high-burden patients are needed to further reduce direct non-medical and indirect economic burdens.